Search for: "MULCAIRE v. MULCAIRE"
Results 1 - 20
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 3:39 am
The Supreme Court has today announced that it has granted permission to appeal to Mr Glenn Mulcaire in the voicemail interception case of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:01 am
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected Mulcaire’s appeal: s 72 excluded his privilege. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:57 pm
Mr Justice Gross sentenced Mr Mulcaire to 6 months’ imprisonment and Clive Goodman to 4 months in prison. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:16 am
The Court of Appeal have listed the appeal which has been lodged by Glenn Mulcaire against the decision of Mr Justice Mann handed down on 17 November 2010 in Phillips v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
On 17 November 2010, Mann J held that Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on the PSI ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:43 pm
Glenn Mulcaire v News Group Newspapers The facts Mr Mulcaire was employed by NGN as a private investigator between 2002 and 2007. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
This argument was given short shrift by Lord Neuberger who said that, in his opinion, it was wrong [73] and was not supported by the Strasbourg jurisprudence [74] Lord Neuberger’s conclusions were as follows: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been ‘commercial information or other intellectual property’ within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:56 am
On 1 February 2012, in their judgment in the case of Coogan and Phillips v NGN and Mulcaire ([2012] EWCA Civ 48) the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination in refusing to answer questions put to him by the two claimants. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
A first instance, Mr Justice Mann accepted that s 72 applied and ordered that Mr Mulcaire provide the requested information. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Ltd ([2008] 1 AC 1), and on the judgment of Lord Neuberger MR in Imerman v Tchenguiz ([2010] EWCA Civ 908). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:11 am
Application by Guardian & Various Claimants v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
A first instance, Mr Justice Mann accepted that section 72 applied and ordered that Mr Mulcaire provide the requested information. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:19 am
“The Court of Appeal today (1 February) dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 4:06 pm
(v) Did Ian Edmonson request him to investigate individuals connected with Max Clifford? [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
Mr Mulcaire appealed against both orders and the appeals were heard together. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:50 am
Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment The Supreme Court has had its first (and perhaps last) look at an issue arising from the phone hacking litigation against the News of the World newspaper. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
There have been numerous developments in the telephone hacking saga which now appear to extend beyond the activities of Glenn Mulcaire. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:42 am
Supreme Court Gow v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 (24 May 2012) Phillips v Mulcaire (Rev 1) [2012] UKSC 28 (24 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867 (04 July 2012) Daejan Properties Ltd v Campbell [2012] EWCA Civ 875 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Ampurius NU Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd [2012] EWHC 1820 (Ch) (04 July 2012) Starbucks… [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
PM's choice for privacy commissioner called 'creepy' by Tom Mulcair http://t.co/b9wZe3UwTX -> Federal Court limits confidentiality rights of federally-regulated industries http://t.co/PsbQWcVRAh -> Google inundated with “right to be forgotten” requests http://t.co/5ARVFLVPV3 -> US Supreme Court Rejects Expanded Inducement Doctrine http://t.co/NkcFD1M0BY -> US Supreme Court: To Be Valid, Patent Claims Must Provide Reasonable Certainty Regarding the… [read post]
