Search for: "MUSLIM ADVOCATES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Last week, the Department of Justice asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to refrain from taking any further action in the leading case challenging President Trump’s already infamous Executive Order (EO) 13769, which temporarily banned entry into the country by nationals of seven predominantly Muslim countries and all refugees, while indefinitely banning entry of Syrian refugees. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
Regan and secured safely in the exalted Zone One of Justice Jackson’s tripartite scheme in Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Letelier v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
” Because the President’s travel ban is not “bona fide,” the court privileged cable news hits from Rudolph Giuliani and Stephen Miller over official statements of the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, to conclude that the policy was in fact animated by animus. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 3:15 pm
” Even as the United States led the world in per capita incarceration, Barr rejected arguments that we were locking up too many. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
In a ruling that sent shockwaves through the internet community, the Ninth Circuit, with one judge dissenting, found that an injunction should have been granted against YouTube, requiring removal of the “Innocence of Muslims” film. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
Section 212(a)(28)(D) and (G) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) deemed inadmissible aliens who “advocate[d]” for or “wr[o]te or publish[ed]” about, “world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:13 pm
He represented the Trump administration in several high-profile victories at the court, including its defense of the president’s September 2017 order – often known as the “travel ban” – restricting immigration to the United States from eight countries, most of which are predominantly Muslim; Janus v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:45 am
” Image via ABA JournalNot much is known about her childhood or history, but Engy has been advocating for Muslim rights since the attacks on 9/11, speaking out against violent Muslim rhetoric and fighting for justice. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
The justices held 8-1 in Pereira v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
Unless you’ve been living in a cave, you already know that on Friday of last week, President Trump signed an executive order banning refugees from seven Muslim majority countries from entering the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Hawaii (2018), which upheld Trump’s executive order banning entry of certain immigrants from majority Muslim nations. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
” The Department of Justice filed a brief Friday urging the Court to dismiss Kiyemba v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
United States in the Trump v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:33 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88-89 (1935). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
