Search for: "MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO." Results 81 - 100 of 256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 5:43 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
" As a result, Vela obtained workers comp benefits from The McClatchy Co., parent company of The Sacramento Bee, along with payment through Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 11:49 pm by Peter
Alternatively, pharmaceutical companies may in some instances rely on the mutual recognition procedure, by which the assessment and marketing authorisation of one member state should be mutually recognised by other concerned countries within the EU. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
The second paragraph cites the key sentence from Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
  Drageris the first appellate court post-Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 12:08 am
(Biotech Blog) United States: Patent for generating oxygen in a process that mimics photosynthesis (Competitive info)   Products Adderall (Dextroamphetamine/Racemic DL-ampthetamine) - US: Judge denies Sandoz’ bid for summary judgment of non infringement in patent dispute with Shir eover Adderall (Law360) Carbatrol (Carbamazepine) - US: Judge refuses to grant summary judgment to Corepharma in patent dispute with Shire Laboratories over generic Carbatrol (Law360) Clarinex… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
(citing, inter alia, Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
Ct. 1057 (2007), State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Cloer – may a person who missed a deadline to make a claim for  vaccine-caused injury still recover attorney’s fees and costs for pursuing the claim 12-142 — Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
For this blog, Ronald Mann previews Tuesday’s oral arguments in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 681 P.2d 1038, 1052 (Kan. 1984). [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:33 am
The Supreme Court’s justification for overturning that decision was that Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., the manufacturer, was legally required to copy Clinoril, so it couldn’t be held liable for claims that the drug was unsafe. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:34 am by Sean Wajert
The Supreme Court last week reversed the First Circuit decision in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 10:20 am by Bexis
Aug. 15, 2013), put it squarely in the red in explaining why no type of design defect claims survive preemption in generic drug cases after Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
Ever since Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]