Search for: "MacE v. MacE"
Results 1 - 20
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Paolino v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
This is quite an extraordinary indictment of the Birmingham schools, given that it's long enough that they've gotten word that Plessy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:33 am
That choice led to a dispute in Mace v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Federal criminal trial lawyer, Russell Mace, also argued that stalking should not be a crime of violence under United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G) 2K2.1 and 4B1.2 because it does not meet the test set out in the recent Supreme Court decision of Begay v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 11:56 am
Paolino v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:24 am
Nancy Mace’s district). [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:37 pm
Paolino v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 2:43 pm
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has a press release which notes that: Journalists were kicked, punched, sprayed with mace and intimidated when an FBI agent pointed a rifle at them while trying to cover an FBI raid on a high-profile political activist in Puerto Rico in February 2006. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:10 pm
The officer Maced him as he ran off. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 9:38 am
Photographing defendant's face to determine what type of "mace" he was sprayed with by the officer was not an illegal search. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
Which is why last summer’s decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Mace v Tunick was such an eye opener. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:12 am
IHS (IBIA) Declaration of Joseph Mace [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:46 am
Hurd in Avitabile v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:59 am
In San Francisco v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:25 am
The Court of Appeals says plaintiffs may have a case.The case is Perez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:18 am
High Court (Commercial Court) Meritz Fire and Marine Insurance Co Ltd. v Jan De Nul NV & Anor [2010] EWHC 3362 (Comm) (21 December 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Malcolm v Ministry of Justice [2010] EWHC 3389 (QB) (21 December 2010) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) D Morgan Plc v Mace & Jones (a firm) [2010] EWHC 3375 (TCC) (22 December 2010) Redwing Construction Ltd v Wishart [2010] EWHC 3366 (TCC) (22 December… [read post]
