Search for: "MacFarlane v. MacFarlane" Results 1 - 20 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2013, 6:40 am by ProBonoGA
  As described in the blog, the steps to the most recent decision, Bergen v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm by Rosalind English
Macfarlane and others v United Kingdom (ECHR 329 (2012) – read press release Tomorrow the Strasbourg Court will hear complaints in four applications that UK law has failed adequately to protect the applicants’ right to manifest their religion, contrary to Articles 9 (freedom of religion) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination). [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm by Michel-Adrien
The National Self-Represented Litigants Project (NSRLP) has published a new report entitled Pintea v Johns: An Updated Commentary.The Supreme Court of Canada decision Pintea v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:40 am by ProBonoGA
  As described in the blog, the steps to the most recent decision, Bergen v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:57 pm by Mary Whisner
And of course, where would Civil Procedure be without Erie Railroad v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:03 pm
Macfarlane as trustees, and against Mr. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Limited and another (Appellants) UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  Macfarlane P found, inter alia, that the Sheikh and orchestrated the unlawful abduction of one of his daughters in Cambridge. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 4:03 pm
On Tuesday, the Nevada Supreme Court heard argument in State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew MacFarlane recently issued some guidance on the anonymisation of published judgments in family court cases. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 5:46 am by INFORRM
On 21 March 2018 the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr and Reed and Lady Black) granted the defendants permission to appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]