Search for: "Madden v State" Results 1 - 20 of 299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
The most maddening moment for the defense came at the lunch break when Merchan stated, “I agree that it would have been better if some of these things had been left unsaid. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
Supreme Court streams live audio of oral arguments, New York is way behind the times; the official court rules for coverage of People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
(Tori Madden) The USDA asked the court to dismiss the case. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:12 am by jonathanturley
This year, the Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech in 303 Creative v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am by Walter Shaub
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm by Marketing
Decisions from the Federal Circuit Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"21 NYCRR 1401.7(c) provides that a FOIL request is deemed denied if there is no response to the request within five business days (Matter of Madden v Village of Tuxedo Park, 192 AD3d 802); 4. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"21 NYCRR 1401.7(c) provides that a FOIL request is deemed denied if there is no response to the request within five business days (Matter of Madden v Village of Tuxedo Park, 192 AD3d 802); 4. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
EFF appealed the case before the state's transparency board, which eventually forced Escobedo to release a slideshow and receipts showing the city had wasted more than 4 million pesos on the Sistema de Predicción de Delitos (SPRED) project. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:40 am by crobertson
The closest we came was a case involving a flight attendant, Est. of Madden v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Michael C. Dorf
I just don't think it's his preferred course of action.However, if the Democrats were to abolish the filibuster now and enact a law more or less codifying Roe v. [read post]