Search for: "Maddux v Schur"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2012, 3:08 am
This case, Dealey-Doe-Eyes Maddux v Schur ; 2011 NY Slip Op 02763 ; Appellate Division, Third Department falls into that category. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:57 am
This case,Dealey-Doe-Eyes Maddux v Schur ;2011 NY Slip Op 02763 ;Decided on April 7, 2011 ;Appellate Division, Third Department falls into that category. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am
A legal malpractice claim requires, among other things, the existence of an attorney-client relationship between the client and the attorney (see Maddux v Schur, 16 AD3d 873, 874 [3d Dept 2005]; Tabner v Drake, 9 AD3d 606, 609 [3d Dept 2004]). [read post]