Search for: "Madrid v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2023, 8:30 am by Marcel Pemsel
It is still up to the designated Member State of the Madrid Protocol and its national law whether it will accept sound, motion or multimedia marks. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am by Marcel Pemsel
Further, member states of the Madrid Protocol can delay the effectiveness by notifying WIPO and there is no ultimate deadline (Rule 40(8) Regulations). [read post]
Case date: 21 April 2022 Case number: No. 19-55864 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Here's the abstract:In its judgment of 3 February 2012 in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy: Greece intervening), the International Court of Justice has considered the relationship between jus cogens and the rule of State immunity. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Instead of the state map let's use a city or a county map. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 10:28 pm
The first briefly presents the basic elements of the judgment of the Court in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy: Greece intervening); the second part identifies and discusses some problems raised by the judgment. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Jeffrey Bellin
Discussion The basic test for identifying a Fourth Amendment seizure comes from Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]