Search for: "Mahler, in Re"
Results 61 - 77
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm
Ch. 2004); and In re Arrow Inv. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 11:27 am
Teri Rasmussen: Clients seem to like it, especially when I’m able to send them a link to a post on point with something they’re dealing with. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am
As Peter Mahler once wrote, “[I]f you’re a petitioner in a dissolution proceeding you need to load up your petition (or supplemental affidavits) with as many facts as are available in support of your claims; bare ‘notice’ pleading will not suffice. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
Hoffheimer, 98 Law Library Journal 61 (2006)(list Top 3 movies,and Top 20 recommended Bollywood law films) http://www.aallnet.org/products/pub_llj_v98n01/2006-03.pdfLes bonnes causes = Don’t Tempt the Devil (France, 1963; Director: Christian-Jaque) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0132892/Paul Dupré meurt soudainement suite à une injectionfaite par son infirmière, Gina Bianchi. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:08 am
If you’re not on ‘Saucer,’ you’re nowhere! [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:37 am
., No. 160529/2019 (NY County 2021), not only because it sheds light on two hot topics in buy-sell agreements, but also because Peter Mahler and I represent the prevailing parties in the case. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:08 pm
Mahler:"Tom Carhart brings a soldier's perspective to his analysis of Lee's tactical thinking at Gettysburg. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
“The next time someone tells me they’re preparing a shareholder buy-sell agreement using a fixed price memorialized in a so-called Certificate of Value, I’m going to tell them to rename it a Certificate of Legal Fees,” said Peter Mahler a decade ago. [read post]
Court Rejects Oppressed Shareholder’s Bid for Dissolution or Buy-Out, Finds Money Damages Sufficient
5 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Accordingly, the Court held, “the re-classification of payments into loans payable solely by Nedal constitutes oppressive conduct. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
Way back in 2007, Peter Mahler observed that dissolution involving 50/50 shareholders raises some of the trickiest tactical decisions for litigation counsel. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:51 am
You know you’re in big trouble if the post-trial decision in a lawsuit you filed begins like this: “The court finds the plaintiff, Rowen Seibel, not credible. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
Realty Corp., 68 AD3d 1009 [2d Dept 2009] [“Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying” respondent’s untimely buyout election]; In re Flushing Off. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
” Several years ago, Peter Mahler explored the BCL 1118 election in the aptly-titled post, A Deep Dive into the Election to Purchase in Dissolution Proceedings. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
A decision earlier this month by an upstate appellate court in a corporate dissolution proceeding called Matter of Stevens (Allied Builders, Inc.), 2010 NY Slip Op 05066 (4th Dept June 11, 2010), adds uncertainty to the already fuzzy array of precedents surrounding the question whether the filing of a dissolution petition triggers a mandatory buyback of the petitioner's shares under the provisions of a right of first refusal… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
The other day, I introduced my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
Mahler, When Limited Liability Companies Seek Judicial Dissolution, Will the Statute Be Up to the Task? [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 28, 2008 Mahler v. [read post]
