Search for: "Mai v. City of Garden City"
Results 41 - 60
of 451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
Auth., 182 AD3d 970, 971; Matter of Brennan v New York State Dept. of Health, 159 AD3d 1250, 1252; Matter of Trotman v New York State Cts., 117 AD3d 1164, 1165; Matter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 61 AD3d 1266, 1268; Matter of Cushion v Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 46 AD3d 1095, 1096; cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:32 am
From Doe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
The terraced gardens behind the main residence convey the opulence of the era. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Garden City, NY (Richard S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Garden City, NY (Richard S. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
New York City Transit Auth., 684 F.3d 286, 305 (2d Cir. 2012); Doe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900: “In my judgment, Section 8(1) of the 1900 Act imposes an enduring obligation to retain the new garden land as a public garden and integral part of the existing Victoria Tower Gardens. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Empls. of the City of N. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:01 am
In Florida Star v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am
Smith is a gardener with the City of Kitchener. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am
Smith is a gardener with the City of Kitchener. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am
(Citing Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
In fact, the only conditions the Board may have imposed were general conditions applicable to all registrations. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 9:38 am
In Florida Star v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
A v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
The words in Crossley v City of Westminster Council (2006) HLR 26, CA were considered to have direct application to the facts of SR’s case. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Instead, it held that the proper question was whether there was “substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment or may exacerbate existing environmental hazards. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Instead, it held that the proper question was whether there was “substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment or may exacerbate existing environmental hazards. [read post]
