Search for: "Mai v. City of Garden City" Results 161 - 180 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Caldwell v Gutman, Mintz, Baker Sonnfeldt, P.C. ; 2011 NY Slip Op 52116(U) ; Decided on November 25, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County ; Levine, J. give a full history of the conflict. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:00 am
"  Earl Warren, The Memoirs of Earl Warren (Garden City. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:42 am by Neil Cahn
Schecter & Associates, P.C., of Garden City, represented the husband. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:37 am
HudsonQUEENS COUNTYReal PropertyCurbstone Found Not To Be Part of Sidewalk, Responsibility of City, Not Abutting LandownerRodrigues v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:49 am by Phillips & Associates
This employee, they alleged, was responsible for creating the basement room in the defendant’s Garden City Branch Office known as the “Boom Boom Room. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
I note that thus far the universe of identified and quantified claims relates only to approximately six contracts undertaken by the third defendant which may or may not be in breach of restrictions in relation to confidential information or the restrictive covenants. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:45 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
-Fort Worth May 19, 2011) (regardless of who paid for use of garden for wedding, fee was paid for guests' entry and without fee no guests could enter). [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
The construction of a balcony overlooking a neighbour’s garden which results in a complete or substantial lack of privacy for all or part of the garden, with particular significance in the summer months, and which may even diminish the marketability or value of the overlooked property, would appear to satisfy the objective test. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
The construction of a balcony overlooking a neighbour’s garden which results in a complete or substantial lack of privacy for all or part of the garden, with particular significance in the summer months, and which may even diminish the marketability or value of the overlooked property, would appear to satisfy the objective test. [read post]