Search for: "Mail Division Cases" Results 81 - 100 of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
-- I could explain but GTG (got to go) GTRM (going to read mail) -- fan mail in my case. [read post]
25 May 2008, 1:50 am
The person selling it to you might add a little malicious software (containing a keylogger) and steal all your personal and financial information.A recent case showing how pirated software leads to identity theft was announced by the Department of Justice:An Oregon man pleaded guilty today to selling counterfeit computer software with a retail value of more than $1 million, in addition to aggravated identity theft and mail fraud, announced Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal… [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am by Danielle C. Quinn, Stephen P. Younger
In Duncan-Watt, the Commercial Division ruled on Defendants’ motion to dismiss by holding that the dispute resolution clause in the parties’ licensing agreement failed to select Australian courts as the exclusive forum in which to litigate any disputes. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 3:35 pm by Kim Zetter
Companies that use subdomains — for example, for divisions of the firm located in different countries – are vulnerable to such interception and can have their mail intercepted when users mistype a recipient’s e-mail address. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration with the assistance of the Florida Department of Health's Division of Medical Quality Assurance. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration with the assistance of the Florida Department of Health's Division of Medical Quality Assurance. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:08 am
[T]he e-mails sent via company computer under the circumstances of this case were akin to consulting her lawyer in her employer? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:32 am
A-3506-08T1 (Appellate Division/Superior Court, N.J. 2009) is must reading for an employer who provides e-mail access to its employees (practically all employers!) [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
But after a hearing, the New York Family Court opted to dismiss the proceeding because it didn’t think a family offense had been established or that the court’s intervention was warranted in this instance.Despite the senior’s testimony that she had been pushed to the ground over a “missing check sent in the mail,” the Appellate Division, First Department, could find no basis in the record “to disturb the determinations in this case. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a case involving the Board of Educ. of City School District of City of New York,*** the court noted that the New York City Board of Education [BOE] sent a “notice of charges” to a tenured teacher by certified mail, return receipt requested and by regular mail. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:25 am by Solomon Wisenberg
New officials at the Justice Department this year sifted through files and provided documents and e-mail about the case to Schuelke and the subjects of his investigation. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:37 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
An editorial in the Globe & Mail rightly praises the Supreme Court of Canada, calling it "right" when it agreed to hear the case of Hassan Rasouli, despite shifting medical facts. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
The court is reviewing a decision by the Washington State Court of Appeals, Division One. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:36 am by Matthew DeVries
Despite this evidence, the Court held that the plaintiff failed to strictly comply with the statute because there was no proof by the plaintiff that the letter was sent by certified mail to the Risk Management Division. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:17 am by Matthew DeVries
Despite this evidence, the Court held that the plaintiff failed to strictly comply with the statute because there was no proof by the plaintiff that the letter was sent by certified mail to the Risk Management Division. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:17 am by Matthew DeVries
Despite this evidence, the Court held that the plaintiff failed to strictly comply with the statute because there was no proof by the plaintiff that the letter was sent by certified mail to the Risk Management Division. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:36 am by Matthew DeVries
Despite this evidence, the Court held that the plaintiff failed to strictly comply with the statute because there was no proof by the plaintiff that the letter was sent by certified mail to the Risk Management Division. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm by familoo
The Act also gives judges a broad discretion to make up their own mind about the division of assets based on the individual circumstances of each case. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:24 am
District Court.Prosecutors said Malhotra went to work for HP's printing division that May, and in July 2006, he sent e-mails to other HP executives with the confidential IBM information, marked 'for your eyes only.'HP said it responded to the attempt by launching an internal investigation, which led to the executive's firing in September 2006, and to HP notifying law enforcement authorities and IBM. [read post]