Search for: "Maine State Housing Authority v. Miller"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In Toyukak v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
As the vote tallies for the November 2018 federal elections become finalized, one seat in the House of Representatives may not be resolved for several weeks because of an unusual lawsuit filed by Republican incumbent Bruce Poliquin (along with three Republican voters) in Maine. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
In October 2013, the state of Indiana filed Indiana v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am
He’s authored HB 1275 , which would ban all medically induced abortions in the state. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Flanigan, one of his former clerks, was to author it. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
The Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan has described social media as one of the main threats to democracy. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Outside of the five main executing states of Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma, Missouri and Florida, this figure rises to one in five for the remaining 28 jurisdictions that have executed since 1977. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
The Miller case (1976): The third-party doctrine emerges in this case (United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” See: Gomes v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:08 am
The mortgage contained a provision stating that foreclosure on such a loan is not authorized unless also authorized by Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) mandatory regulations governing FHA loans. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:51 pm
Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976), and Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
The mortgage contained a provision stating that foreclosure on such a loan is not authorized unless also authorized by Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) mandatory regulations governing FHA loans. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]
