Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,001
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
A couple of weeks ago, the Superior Court of Justice released an important decision, HCC 77 v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm
Attorney General of CanadaDecision Date: February 21, 2021 The Ontario Superior Court of Justice declared section 91 of the Canada Elections Act, 2000 invalid. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
Photo by Tianyi Ma on UnsplashIn Caplan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 3:31 am
The Court of Justice will, in due course, have to issue a ruling in Nokia v Daimler – and that looming dispute certainly haunts the group’s report. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:41 pm
In Lake v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:45 am
UMNV 205-207 Newbury LLC (UrbanMeritage) v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
"Preliminary" means that the ECJ answers the question, and then the national court resumes its proceedings and enters its judgment, as opposed to a traditional appeal from a final judgment.When I saw the question referred to the ECJ, I already noticed that it was very well written, and I wish the Dusseldorf Regional Court had done a similarly good job in that Nokia v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 1:02 pm
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 12:21 pm
In cases like Pickering v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am
But his main focus centers on an interpretive methodology that, in his view, has enabled the expansion of presidential power. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
See Allergan Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Jackson (election contest): https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/ward-v-jackson/ From the Maricopa County Superior Court Judge’s decision: “The Court finds no misconduct, no fraud, and no effect on the outcome of the election. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Greene felt that a federal lawsuit (LaShawn A. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:15 pm
If your proposal doesn't clearly describe what the main thesis of the book is, the editor and peer reviewers are likely to be confused about it. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:01 am
The decision is from Maine Superior Court Judge Harold Stewart, II (Cumberland County), in John B. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
It closed in 2015, according to court records. [read post]
