Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 41 - 60
of 893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
For the majority, Lord Wilson gave the main judgment. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:11 am
The Secretary of State had two main objections to such an order being made. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 10:23 am
Me.) in Baines v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
United States and Dalmazzi v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:10 am
Supreme Court G Hamilton (Tullochgribban Mains) Ltd v The Highland Council & Anor[2012] UKSC 31 (11 July 2012) ANS & Anor v ML [2012] UKSC 30 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) BA, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 1529 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Keay & Anor v Morris Homes (West Midlands) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 900 (11 July 2012) Holmes & Anor v Evans & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 941 (11 July 2012) BA & Ors… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:16 am
Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department March 29 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has allowed the suspected terrorist Al? [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Hodge and Lord Sales gave the main judgment with which Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Leggatt agreed. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
They lost on their main challenge to the compatibility of the rules with the HRA and judicial review principles, the court holding that in general it is the decision in an individual case which may be incompatible with ECHR rights, rather than the relevant general rules or policies (para. 57). [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Here I consider only the main arguments concerning “parole” of undocumented migrants and control of the southern border generally. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:52 am
It is clear why challengers saw Democrat Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows as the most likely to endorse their theory. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
The secretary of state clearly is an officer. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Tribal rights, water rights, states’ rights and the Colorado River: What’s at stake in the SCOTUS case, Arizona v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 11:58 am
In Block Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:50 pm
R (o.t.a Cornwall Waste Forum, St Dennis Branch) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Court of Appeal, 29 March 2012, read judgment The CA has just held that Collins J was wrong to hold (per my previous post) that the local NGO had a legitimate expectation that the Secretary of State would decide an air pollution issue, rather than leave it to the Environment Agency. [read post]
