Search for: "Mains v. K Mart Corp."
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Farnsworth, 965 P.2d 1209, 1220 (Alaska 1998), has not imposed an alternative design element, Maines v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
K-Mart Corp., 612 S.E.2d 25, 28-29 (Ga. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Gatke Corp., 132 Cal. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Anita K. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Patent it – Citigroup’s patent on ‘synthetic currency transaction network’ (IP ADR Blog) USPTO seeks National Medal of Technology and Innovation nominations (Daily Dose of IP) US Patents – Decisions ITC: Initial determination in LG’s favour in Whirlpool fridge patent case (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amsted Industries – ITC denies motion to quash non-party… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less, undercutting the designated United States importer's national… [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
