Search for: "Major v. State of Indiana et al" Results 61 - 80 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Taking on a major new constitutional dispute over gun rights, the Supreme Court agreed on Wednesday to decide whether to apply the Second Amendment to state, county, and city government laws. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
For publication opinions today (5): In Lauth Indiana Resort & Casino v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
The case, Armour, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
Town Council, Town of Whitestown, Indiana, et al (NFP) - judicial immunity. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm by Cicely Wilson
The Seventh Circuit affirmed, finding that the legislation is not preempted by the scheme of federal labor law and does not violate any constitutional rights.Read More: 7th Circuit upholds Indiana right-to-work law barring mandatory union duesCO Cross-Disability Coalition, et al v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:24 am
Farm Bureau Insurance Company, et al. , a 9-page opinion on rehearing, the Court reverses its earlier opinion (Nov. 8, 2006 - see ILB entry here - 2nd case) affirming the trial court. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am by David DePaolo
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:20 am
Conclusion This case is remanded to the trial court with instruction to grant Charter One's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.In City of Carmel, Indiana v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Here is the 12/17/03 opinion in D & M Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
Those assets should then be distribited to holders of debt owed by the “old Chrysler,” the  funds argued in Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Alpharma, Inc., Caligor, Inc.; et al. , a 29-page, 2-1 decision, Judge Riley writes:The Kovachs raise one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred by entering summary judgment in favor of the Cup Defendants. [read post]