Search for: "Majors v. Detroit, City of et al" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Matt Flyntz
National League of Professional Baseball Clubs, et al., the Supreme Court ruled that baseball is not subject to federal antitrust law because it is not a form of interstate commerce. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
Bill's Electric, Inc. (17-CA-18629-1, et al: 350 NLRB No. 31) Webb City, MO July 24, 2007. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
L&M Arts, et al., case number 3:10-cv-00953 in the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
City of Akron, et al    Northern District of Ohio at Akron 08a0260n.06 B & V Distr Co Inc v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm by Shelby Everest
L&M Arts, et al., case number 3:10-cv-00953 in the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm by Shelby Everest
L&M Arts, et al., case number 3:10-cv-00953 in the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:12 am by Eugene Volokh
” United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm by Gareth
In this Circuit, courts traditionally consider …. the [nine] Grinnell factors [City of Detroit v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
. *** Cintas Corp. (4-CA-34160, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 81) Cincinnati, OH Jan. 30, 2009. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Vol. 2, No. 22, August 2, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
According to a consent agreement filed in Kansas City with the U.S. [read post]