Search for: "Majors v. Good" Results 61 - 80 of 16,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm by Natasha Brunstein
This factor, on its own, would have stood in the way of a repeal of the Clean Power Plan, because a repeal would have done “more harm than good” and therefore constituted an “arbitrary and capricious” action under the Supreme Court’s analysis in Michigan v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:51 pm
SCOTOSblog has its usual comprehensive coverage of the first Supreme Court case of this term, Altria Group v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 While there are many things to say about the DMCA analysis (primarily: good job!) [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:20 pm by Karen Ainslie (ZA)
In UASA, Solidaity and NUM v Lonmin Platinum PLC and AMCU (HO1312-18), the CCMA was tasked with determining the question of whether three minority trade unions, acting jointly, could obtain organisational rights at Lonmin in order to challenge the influence of the majority union (AMCU). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 6:33 am
In my recently published book, The Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]