Search for: "Majors v. Owens" Results 1 - 20 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Owen v Hurlbut Owen is a relatively rare example of the powerful convergence of two common-law doctrines in the same business divorce case: misappropriation of corporate opportunity and faithless servant. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
Copyright and libraries expert Victoria Owen appeared on the Law Bytes Podcast to discuss the implications of the Canadian Copyright Act. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
In a guest post, HH Peter Collier KC looks critically at the controversy between the treatment of the institution of Holy Matrimony and the institution of civil marriage as distinct realities The note from the Legal Office Prayers of Love and Faith, GS 1339 summarises the legal background to the decision of the House of Bishops that it should commend Prayers of Love and Faith, a draft of which is contained in Annex B to GS 2289. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
To describe the decisions as “controversial” would be a major understatement. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
There was also a hearing in the case of LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Josh Blackman
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
Industry Expert Article* Cooperation Standards in Government Investigations: Practical Tips By Owen Russell, Giel Stein, Ashish Prasad, and Michael Sarlo Cooperation with law enforcement is a strategy that every corporation involved in a government investigation must consider. [read post]
Chief Judge Priscilla Owen supported the majority reading of the statute, stating that the statute does not say anything about identity theft, but rather imposes an enhancement for certain felonies on anyone who “knowingly … uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person. [read post]