Search for: "Mak, in Re" Results 61 - 80 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 10:08 am
’ Defendant contrasts that meaning of `use’ with the meaning of the phrases,`putting to service of a thing’ and `mak[ing] instrumental to an end. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:10 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Hoge acknowledged that “one of the biggest challenges we have” is “building confidence in the vaccine” while “mak[ing] sure we’re making the right scientific choices and we’re presenting honestly the uncertainties around those choices. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:30 am by Sarah Grant
New Zealand The Royal New Zealand Navy announced this week that the frigate HMSNZ Te Kaha has been temporarily re-tasked to support the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:14 am by SHG
There is no “mak[ing] sure they are not heard” that doesn’t make them heard at the same time. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:01 am
mak ve oradan bir karar beklemek hatad? [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:09 pm by Josh Blackman
Some years ago, I remarked that "[w]e're all textualists now. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:53 am by SHG
  The 7th Circuit's chief complaint of Marksym's writing is that it "mak[es] it impossible for the defendants to know what wrongs they were accused of committing. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IAM) (Inventive Step) House passes HR 3114 which permits patent side of the PTO to ‘borrow’ money from the trademark side (Inventive Step)   US Patent Reform ‘Reasonable royalty payments’ in need of a reform (IP Osgoode)   US Patents USPTO initiates patent prosecution highway pilot program with Finland (Patent Docs) Appeals ‘skyrocket’ at the USPTO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Changing nature of inventing:… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm by Elie Mystal
They’re talking about having to deal with this guy for three years. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 9:58 am
" An ad on its own website stated, "If you're hooking up your high-definition TV to basic cable, you're not getting the best picture on every channel. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm by RatnerPrestia
Notably, the Design Day 2013 presentation does not mention either In re Salmon or In re Daniels; the two cases currently identified in MPBP § 1504.04 that seemingly condone the practice of disclaiming portions of a design. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IP Watchdog) Legal studies program suspended (just_n_examiner) Books as prior art (just_n_examiner) Northern District of Illinois continues as top IP court – Administrative Office of the US Courts 2008 Annual Report (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Re-exam delays cause trouble for patent owners (Law360) Recovering pate [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:26 am by Andrew Frisch
The last few weeks have brought their share of interesting misclassification/exemption cases. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:01 am by Gene Quinn
The author of the treatise is Jeff Sheldon, who is a partner with Sheldon Mak & Anderson. [read post]
On the other hand, we’re already in an election year and Congress has a lot of other matters on its plate. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 10:40 am
**UPDATEThe 271Blog discussed on 26 Dec. an aspect of the PubPat brief:Interestingly, the brief suggests that patent applicants and practitioners are not entirely within the purview of the "public interest":[A]rguments regarding the public interest made by patent holders and patent attorneys should be carefully scrutinized, because they are, in fact, the special interests that benefit from the patent system and what benefits them personally may not actually benefit the public… [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 am by Raffaela Wakeman
And The Hill reports on the latest reactions from the internet freedom advocates on the reintroduction of CISPA, the cybersecurity bill that was passed in the House in the last Congress but mostly ignored by the Senate (hint: they’re not happy). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:32 pm by John Elwood
  But they’re a cautious lot, and generally won’t give you the thumbs up unless everything is glatt.The most interesting fact to me is that the government apparently acted to have his name striken from the brief. [read post]