Search for: "Maldonado v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 2:14 pm
Hopefully good will prevails in the dining room this week despite the circuit court’s third reversal of the district court in Elsa Maldonado, et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:06 am
Maldonado, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Tuesday, August 21, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Diversity, Engagement, Institutional Investors, Shareholder voting Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:33 am
A reasonable jury, said the court, could consider them in determining the cumulative effect of the incidents she purportedly endured after complaining about harassment (Maldonado-Catala v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
Supp.2d 303, 313 (D.P.R. 2011), citing, Maldonado-Denis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:09 am
However, the employees were granted partial summary judgment on their state law claim that the surcharge was a tip under the NYLL following the effective date of the 2011 Regulations (Maldonado v BTB Events & Celebrations, Inc, November 22, 2013, Engelmayer, P). [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del. 1981), is a director duty that may not be delegated. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del. 1981), is a director duty that may not be delegated. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am
Maldonado v DiBre, 140 AD3d 1501 [3d Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 908 [2016] [“even if, as plaintiffs claim, the loss of the units was not voluntary, they still would not have standing to pursue derivative claims”]). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
In a similar vein, in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:28 am
After 1997, when the IRS adopted check-the-box regulations cementing pass-through partnership tax treatment for LLCs, New York and other states flipped the default rule, i.e., members are no longer permitted to withdraw unless authorized by the operating agreement. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
All this in a state – Illinois – where the highest court forbids FDCA-based common-law causes of action (see Martin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Nov. 21, 2021)Maldonado v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
