Search for: "Malik v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2010, 11:05 am
The defendant moved under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss counts II and V of the plaintiff's complaint, alleging discrimination on the basis of race, religion or national origin and strict liability for malicious conduct.Analysis: To state a "claim of discrimination in lending practices, a plaintiff must allege (1) that plaintiff is a member of a protected class who sought a loan for property; (2) that plaintiff qualified for a loan; (3) that a bank denied plaintiff's… [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:46 am
District Judge James V. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:14 am
Shezad Malik. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:59 pm
Malik (125 Nev. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
Malik v Manchester Crown Court [2008] EWHC 1362 (Admin), Dyson LJ gave the judgment of the court (which included Pitchford and Ouseley JJ) it was held that the police were justified in demanding that freelance journalist Shiv Malik hand over source material for a book on terrorism, but the terms of the production order were too wide. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:07 am
In Howard v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:31 am
Shezad Malik. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:06 am
Probationary employee dismissed on the basis of reports indicating a potential violation of the employer’s rulesMatter of Shabazz v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 63 AD3d 1253The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme dismissing a petition filed by Malik Shabazz seeking a review a determination of Correctional Services’ terminating his employment.Shabazz, who had been appointed as a chaplain, was serving his probationary period. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 12:16 am
Shezad Malik. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:00 pm
Shezad Malik. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:40 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Johnson, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 385 (04 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Houldsworth & Anor v Bridge Trustees Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 179 (04 March 2010) Malik v Kalyan [2010] EWCA Civ 113 (04 March 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Vercoe & Ors v Rutland Fund Management Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 424 (Ch) (05 March 2010) Bellway Homes Ltd v Beazer Homes Ltd [2010] EWHC 423 (Ch)… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:26 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Houldsworth & Anor v Bridge Trustees Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 179 (04 March 2010) Malik v Kalyan [2010] EWCA Civ 113 (04 March 2010) Shell UK Ltd & Ors v Total UK Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 180 (04 March 2010) Zeital & Anor v Kaye & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 159 (05 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Johnson, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 385 (04 March 2010) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:55 am
However, affording the legal malpractice cause of action a liberal construction and according the plaintiff every favorable inference, the complaint does state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see generally Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; Maiolini v McAdams & Fallon, P.C., 61 AD3d 644, 645; Malik v Beal, 54 AD3d 910, 911). [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:20 am
Probationary employee dismissed on the basis of reports indicating a potential violation of the employer’s rulesMatter of Shabazz v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 63 AD3d 1253The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme dismissing a petition filed by Malik Shabazz seeking a review a determination of Correctional Services’ terminating his employment.Shabazz, who had been [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:08 pm
Shezad Malik. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Some States recognize "common law" marriages. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am
The RPT has stated in some decisions that it sees the RRO as a punishment (see for example the decision of the Midland RPT in Jennings & Others v Malik) but when calculating how much to return to the occupiers it tends to look at the condition of the property and its reduced value to the tenants due to its failure to be in a condition which it would need to be in to obtain a property licence. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am
The RPT has stated in some decisions that it sees the RRO as a punishment (see for example the decision of the Midland RPT in Jennings & Others v Malik) but when calculating how much to return to the occupiers it tends to look at the condition of the property and its reduced value to the tenants due to its failure to be in a condition which it would need to be in to obtain a property licence. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:05 am
V. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:01 pm
Shezad Malik. [read post]
