Search for: "Mangum v. Mangum" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm by KC Johnson
The city’s attorneys—who according to the AP have already charged Durham more than $5 million for their services—continued to maintain that, when all was said and done, the city and its employees handled Crystal Mangum’s charges properly. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by KC Johnson
And here’s how the Durham brief describes Mangum’s initial interaction with Gottlieb & Himan: “Repeating her earlier allegations, [emphasis added] Mangum told the officers that three men had raped her, and provided physical descriptions. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by KC Johnson
To take one example: in a high-profile 2011 decision, Henry v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:11 am by KC Johnson
Very broadly reading the terms of the 2009 Ashcroft v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:34 pm by KC Johnson
Under the Supreme Court's precedent in Brady v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:25 am by Howard Wasserman
(Or, at the very least, such a claim would have had to run through catch-all substantive due process and City of Sacramento v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm by Howard Wasserman
(Or, at the very least, such a claim would have had to run through catch-all substantive due process and City of Sacramento v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Also see ---> Private student loan collection suit not removable to federal court (addressing state vs. federal jurisdiction issue in context of original collection suit; sanctions imposed for improper removal in Richards v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by KC Johnson
For instance, the brief points to a 5thCircuit case, Hand v. [read post]