Search for: "Mann v. Good" Results 1 - 20 of 302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2013, 11:21 am by David Friedman
Some people hold a position for good reasons, some for bad. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 12:41 pm
Mann did not initially satisfy this requirement, but he thought up a good one pretty quickly. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm by Kurt Schulzke
None of this is to say that Michael Mann has been found liable for fraud. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
  Caminetti v United States, 242 U.S. 470 (1917) held that the Mann Act's prohibition on the transportation of women or girls across state lines "for the purpose of prostitution, or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose" included the purpose of non-commercial but extra-marital sex. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Mann J turned first to Barnet v Crozier [1987] 1 WLR 272, in which the scholar Claimant, Mr Barnet, had sued a journalist, Mr Crozier, and The Spectator, in libel. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
Appellants Make UC a Good Neighbor and The People’s Park Historic District Advocacy Group (collectively, Good Neighbor) challenge the EIR’s sufficiency as to both. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The second day of the trial in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC took place yesterday before Mr Justice Mann. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
In a recent post on Inforrm, my good friend Dr Paul Wragg sets out a detailed argument critiquing the High Court’s recent decision in Cliff Richard’s successful privacy claim against the BBC (Richard v BBC). [read post]