Search for: "Mann v. Good"
Results 1 - 20
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Prawns À la Lenovo In January, the judgment in IDG v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 1583 what appeared to be a good decision for implementers. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
These facts were borne from evidence which the High Court was entitled to accept; andOn due cause, the Court found (with some difficulty) that there was no error of law or principle in the High Court judge applying Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529 (Ch), in which Kitchin J had observed that the test for showing due cause is "relatively stringent" - in other words it is not enough to show that a sign has been innocently adopted, there must be something… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
On that sort of balancing, see me and my ICLE colleagues Brian Albrecht and Geoff Manne on out-of-market effects here. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:05 am
In Vlaming v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
It’s a good book, but I only counted 982,343 cats. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
There’s also a useful “tl;dr” explainer by Sam Bowman and Geoff Manne (here). [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia stressed in Verizon v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm
Similarly, Geoffrey Manne, Kristian Stout, and I proposed in our paper, “Who Moderates the Moderators? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
” Although the test’s threshold is viewed as relatively low, not all cases justify removal, and where the state opposes removal and offers persuasive reasons for why Mesa is not satisfied, the burden is very much on the removing party to provide specific reasons as to why the test is met.[6] The Mesa test remains good law and applies to all removals under section 1442.[7] “Although the statute is ‘liberally construed’… the Supreme Court has cautioned… [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
It defines Scope 3 emissions as “indirect upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions, other than scope 2 emissions, from sources that the reporting entity does not own or directly control and may include, but are not limited to, purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commutes, and processing and use of sold products. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
Failing to receive a prompt response, Geldon added “[v]ery telling that you don’t even respond to text messages now that you don’t need help getting confirmed. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
After the oral arguments in Twitter v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, LLP v Law Firm of Howard Mann, 141 AD3d 574 [2d Dept 2016]). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
Appellants Make UC a Good Neighbor and The People’s Park Historic District Advocacy Group (collectively, Good Neighbor) challenge the EIR’s sufficiency as to both. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In our previous post on Gonzalez v. [read post]
