Search for: "Manners v. Manners"
Results 21 - 40
of 26,140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 4:00 am
Hong v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:00 am
Hong v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
" The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in Regan v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:00 am
Since she was unable to unequivocally demonstrate that her spouse had consented to receive the paperwork in the manner RR utilized, and since there was no court order authorizing what she did, the AD2 agreed that the effort was “ineffective,” jurisdiction was lacking, and that the litigation’s dismissal was appropriate.That didn’t serve her well at all.# # #DECISIONR. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am
Salamone v Deily & Glastetter, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31569(U) May 3, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160104/2022Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
Thus, in Auerbach v Bennett (47 NY2d 619 [1979]), New York’s highest court held that courts have the power in shareholder derivative litigation to grant unnamed interested shareholders leave to intervene – even for the first time on appeal. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
General guidance on confidentiality: the Fujifilm v Kodak decision, LD Düsseldorf, UPC_CFI_355/2023, 27 March 2024 In these proceedings, the defence to infringement was based on a prior use argument deriving from an acquisition in 2017. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
The court rejected those arguments because it had already decided in Licavoli v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Additionally, petitioner demonstrated that NYCTA had the opportunity to investigate the essential facts in a timely manner, establishing that petitioner's delay did not cause substantial prejudice to NYCTA (see Matter of Mejia v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Additionally, petitioner demonstrated that NYCTA had the opportunity to investigate the essential facts in a timely manner, establishing that petitioner's delay did not cause substantial prejudice to NYCTA (see Matter of Mejia v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:44 am
The court found that the insured had failed to conduct itself in a timely or prudent manner. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:51 pm
Using controlled substances in a manner that endangers the child’s health and safety. [read post]
