Search for: "Maples v. Maples"
Results 41 - 60
of 436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am
Some however, were blocked or cancelled (including the Washington Redskins mark) on that basis before the Supreme Court held the bar unconstitutional in Matal v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:55 pm
Moreover, the FCA decision explicitly relies not only on the 1943 SCC decision in Vigneux, but to two other SCC decisions, namely Maple Leaf Broadcasting v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:10 am
Teamsters Local Union 847 v Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment In Teamsters Local Union 847 v Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, 2019 CanLII 95328 (ON LA) (“Teamsters”), a labour arbitrator upheld an employer’s dismissal of a part-time employee for cause because of her breach of its absentee policy. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:58 am
Coulson LJ relied on the decision of HHJ Graham Wood QC in Olesiej v Maple Industries which concerned a related argument over the recovery of translators fees. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:20 pm
In State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:47 pm
Forest Service v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:34 am
In Teamsters Local Union 847 v Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, 2019 CanLII 95328 (ON LA), a labour arbitrator upheld the reasonable application of a workplace absenteeism policy. [read post]
Ontario, Canada: Employee’s Excessive Absences to Pursue Education Need Not be Tolerated by Employer
27 Jan 2020, 9:33 am
In Teamsters Local Union 847 v Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, 2019 CanLII 95328 (ON LA), a part-time restaurant employee in Ontario, Canada with two years’ seniority was discharged from her employment because her absenteeism rate was higher than the maximum permitted under the company’s Absenteeism Policy. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 8:56 am
In Maple Drake Austell Owner LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:56 pm
Accordingly, the court held that there was a rational basis for the ZBA to conclude that the hardship was self-created. 54 Marion Avenue, LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:11 pm
In the recent CBC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
[emphasis added] The flexibility to consider these other factors is still discretionary by directors, and subject to the business judgment rule, explained in Maple Leaf Foods Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
On 11 July 2019 Master Cook handed down judgment in the case of Osagie v Serco Ltd and Ors [2019] EWHC 1803 (QB). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
The Canadian Bar Association “IP Day” – May 30, 2019At the Canadian Bar Association’s perennial “IP day” on May 30, 2019, there was a first ever “town hall” session on the Copyright Board (the “Board”). [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 1:59 pm
In the recent CBC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:02 am
Maple Leaf Foods Inc., 2018 ONCA 407 (38187) Was there a duty of care, was it breached, and should there be liability for reputational harm. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 6:51 am
Referring to the “sensible, fair and practicable dividing line” that was laid down in the case of Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons & Simmons (a firm) [1995] 1 WLR 1602, the court noted that: “… the courts have developed a clear and common-sense dividing line between those matters which the client must prove, and those which may better be assessed upon the basis of the evaluation of a lost chance. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Menard v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:43 am
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of February 4, 2019 from Wise Law on Twitter: 170 top in-house lawyers warn they will direct their dollars to law firms promoting diversity‘Significant’ development expected Tuesday in case of alleged serial killer Bruce McArthur, Toronto police sayUS v. [read post]
