Search for: "Marc DeGirolami"
Results 141 - 160
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Eugene has graciously invited me to write a few posts about my new article, Traditionalism Rising (forthcoming in the Journal of Contemporary Legal Studies and part of a symposium this fall at the University of San Diego School of Law). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:49 pm
But our own Marc DeGirolami, in the comments to Eric's post, says, in effect, hold the phone: "If this is merely a call for elegant writing, then I suppose I agree (who could be against that?). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
John's on Religious Legal Theory: Religion in Law, Law in Religion put together by Mark Movsesian and Marc DeGirolami. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 2:51 pm
I am hoping some gentle soul will emerge (as Justin Levitt and Marc DeGirolami did in years past) to organize the information. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:11 pm
I am hoping some gentle soul will emerge (as Justin Levitt and Marc DeGirolami did in years past) to organize the information. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:11 pm
I am hoping some gentle soul will emerge (as Justin Levitt and Marc DeGirolami did in years past) to organize the information. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:40 am
I am hoping some gentle soul will emerge (as Justin Levitt and Marc DeGirolami did in years past) to organize the information. [read post]
1 May 2015, 5:43 pm
Free Exercise by Moonlight, By Marc O. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
DeGirolami reviews J. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
.), many more junior but very prominent figures in the field (Adam Samaha, Caroline Mala Corbin, Jessie Hill, Marc DeGirolami, etc., etc.), and some very prominent folks who have written less regularly about law and religion but are helping to shape current debates in the field with their own interventions (most prominently Brian Leiter of Chicago). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:24 pm
As my colleague Marc DeGirolami has argued, tradition is an often-overlooked factor in many constitutional doctrines, very much including the Court's establishment and free exercise jurisprudence. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:21 pm
In a recent Legal Spirits podcast, my colleague, Marc DeGirolami, and I discuss different possibilities. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:21 pm
John’s University School of Law) 12:30-1:30 Lunch 1:30-3:00 Panel III: Retributivism and Policy Panelists: Mark Tunick (Florida Atlantic University, Political Science) Luis Chiesa (Pace Law School) Marc DeGirolami (St. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:24 pm
My colleague, Marc DeGirolami, and I have recorded a podcast on Johnson's comments that explores the controversy in more depth. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
John's on Religious Legal Theory: Religion in Law, Law in Religion put together by Mark Movsesian and Marc DeGirolami. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:05 am
John’s colleagues Mark Movsesian and Marc DeGirolami. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
And, as my colleague Marc DeGirolami has explained, her writings about stare decisis—the idea that judges should stick to decided cases and not overrule them, even if judges think those cases are wrong—are well within the American legal tradition. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
Marc DeGirolami writes with the following comment on Garnett: I noticed on your Legal Theory Blog that you had posted an excerpt from Rick Garnett's piece on the NRO blog, where Rick asks who could possibly believe in "never" invalidating laws on constitutional grounds. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:13 pm
We also have a number of distinguished veterans: Bill Araiza, Paul Secunda, Michael Risch, Marc DeGirolami, Marc Blitz, and Will Baude. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:54 am
If that's right, Marc's question--"if the issue is persuasion, what is the most effective method of achieving it? [read post]
