Search for: "March v. Municipal Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2014, 2:10 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has issued an opinion - Yates v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:29 am
On March 22, a decision by the Massachusetts Appeals Court made a small but significant change in the authority of District Court and Boston Municipal Court judges to screen out criminal charges that may have been improperly issued or legally flawed. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
March 10, 2016 Leavitt, J.), the Commonwealth Court ruled that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of municipalities for failure to correct a dangerous road condition. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Port Authority, a summary order issued on March 30. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:17 am
Los Angeles County, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 10-56017 (March 10, 2011). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
Recalling firefighters on General Municipal Law Section 207-a disability leave to report for light duty Cohoes v Local 2562, IAFF, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686Barnes v Council 82 [Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719What is the proper procedure for a municipal employer to a call disabled firefighter or police officer back to work for a light duty assignment? [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
A "special relationship" tempers a municipality's immunity from liability for discretionary actions taken by its agentsAlvarado v City of New York, 2009 NY Slip Op 01581, Decided on March 5, 2009, Appellate Division, First DepartmentLenora Alva alleged that while acting as an interpreter for the New York City Police Department during the course of an investigation into a complaint of domestic violence, she was assaulted by a knife-wielding individual who was… [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 10:25 am
Supreme Court in 1972 in Barker v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:45 am
The court cited a 1964 decision from the New Jersey Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
Under certain circumstances, a municipality may modify or discontinue providing health insurance benefits to retireesMatter of Kapell v Incorporated Village of Greenport, 63 AD3d 940David E. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:42 am
State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 6:21 am
On March 17, 2010, the First Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Calvao v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:09 pm
” (Quoting Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:00 am
We are discussing Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In Fierro v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Then by March 15, all the municipalities must either notify plaintiffs that they agree to the same kind of open arrangements that were ordered in the earlier case, or else notify the court that they are defending against the lawsuit. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:23 am
In March, 2011, the municipality passed its expropriation by-law. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court of New Jersey decided the matter of State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
"*** The Court of Appeals has already decided that health insurance for retirees is not a retirement benefit protected against being diminished or impaired by the State's Constitution [Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313].** Regarding a municipality's providing health insurance benefits to its retirees, in McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, a decision that could significantly affect a municipal… [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am
Prigg v. [read post]
