Search for: "March v. Municipal Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm
At its March 23, 2012 Conference, the Court will consider such issues as banning religious materials in public schools, entering a home to issue a criminal summons, attorney fees when the case becomes moot on appeal, and whether an issue can be precluded even if it was not “actually decided. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:42 am
The Roscoe v Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) case was released by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia on December 29, 2011. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:46 am
Garcia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:44 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Los Angeles County Flood Control District, Petitioner v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:56 am
MEC for Department of Public Work, Roads and Transport v Botha (20811/2014) [2016] ZASCA 20 (17 March 2016) [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:38 am
City of Palm Bay v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:50 am
On March 22, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inPuerto Rico v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
Supreme Court announced its decision today in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel… [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:18 am
This week the Texas Supreme Court denied the City’s petition for review. [read post]
19 May 2023, 1:18 pm
” . . .In March 2015, Bryant started his treatment with LCMH as required by the court’s order. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 4:10 am
The court held RLUIPA's safe harbor provision protects municipalities that correct their laws from damage suits under RLUIPA. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:07 pm
They lose.The case is Selevan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
Div., A-3305-08T4, March 3, 2010: Pursuant to the Vicious and Potentially Dangerous Dog Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 4:19-17 to -37: (a) The municipal court shall declare a dog to be potentially dangerous if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the dog: (1) caused bodily injury as defined in N.J.S. 2C:11-1 (a) to a person during an unprovoked attack, and poses a serious threat of bodily injury or death to a person [N.J.S.A. 4:19-23(a)(1).] [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:48 am
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel… [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 6:07 am
On March 31, 2008, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, decided Viecelli et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm
While the decision of the Supreme Court in Sackett v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 11:14 am
With the oral argument set for March 2, the briefs keep coming in for the McDonald v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:26 am
In 1978, the Supreme Court held in Monell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:13 pm
Children's Aid Society of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo v. [read post]
