Search for: "Marcia Coyle"
Results 461 - 480
of 981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
On this second day of health care reform arguments before the Supreme Court, we turn once again to Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal for a preview of the day's action: Marcia, what can you tell us about Tuesday's arguments? [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
MARCIA COYLE: All right. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:16 am
For a full explanation of why, read NewsHour Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle's primer here. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
: Marcia Coyle takes a look at arguments surrounding whether the entire Affordable Care Act should fall if the justices find the individual mandate is unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
For more analysis from Marcia Coyle on this week's health care reform hearings, browse The National Law Journal's Health Care at the Supreme Court page. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:50 pm
Each evening on the NewsHour broadcast, Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal and Susan Dentzer of Health Affairs will offer a summary and analysis of the day's arguments. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
Tea Party supporters attend a rally in Searchlight, Nev., in 2010. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:43 pm
MARCIA COYLE: Yes. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm
For more on the issues at stake as the Supreme Court considers the constitutionality of health reform, tune in to the PBS NewsHour's Thursday broadcast for a preview discussion with Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal and Susan Dentzer of Health Affairs. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm
MARCIA COYLE: Yes. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:48 am
Supreme Court Insider: In the latest Supreme Court Insider, Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle analyzed Tuesday’s key oral arguments and decisions in issues ranging from juvenile sentencing to patents and family medical leave. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:12 am
Prometheus Labs; Marcia Coyle/NLJ, SCOTUSBlog, Timothy Lee/ArsTechnica] As I noted last fall, my Cato Institute colleagues Ilya Shapiro, Jim Harper and Timothy Lee filed an amicus brief on behalf of the side that prevailed yesterday, arguing against the spread of “a dangerous exception to traditional patent law… the Court should reject medical-diagnostic patents as impermissibly restricting the freedom of thought. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:12 pm
MARCIA COYLE: No. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:31 pm
MARCIA COYLE: Yes. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
Marcia Coyle previews the arguments for and against. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Greg Stohr of Bloomberg also has coverage, as do Nina Totenberg at NPR’s The Two-Way blog, Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, James Vicini of Reuters, Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal (via the Blog of Legal Times), Nicole Flatow of ACSblog, Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Writing for this blog, Lyle Denniston reports that “a majority of the Justices looked notably unconvinced” that corporations could be sued in U.S. courts for human rights violations perpetrated abroad; similar observations were made by Mike Sacks at the Huffington Post, Robert Barnes at the Washington Post, Marcia Coyle at the National Law Journal, David G. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:42 pm
" Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal reports that "Court skeptical of using U.S. laws in foreign human rights cases. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm
MARCIA COYLE: Yes. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
" Supreme Court Insider: In Monday's edition of our exclusive Supreme Court newsletter, reporters Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle reported on: speculation about Justice Clarence Thomas as a brokered GOP presidential nominee; "weird" oral arguments in Elgin v. [read post]
