Search for: "Marcotte v. Marcotte"
Results 81 - 100
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:01 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm
For Help or More Information Cynthia Marcotte Stamer is recognized among the “Top Rated” Labor & Employment Lawyers in Texas in the 2014 LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® list of Top Rated Lawyers. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
Burwell Supreme Court Oral Argument Read Transcript of King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:19 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
©2015 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
Plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:29 am
., Pfeil v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
The trial judge concluded that s. 24(2) was … Marcotte v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Marcotte, 2014 SCC 55 (35009) Québec’s Consumer Protection Act applies to credit card issuers re conversion charges on purchases made in foreign currencies. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
WAYNE VENTLING v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:57 am
See Aubin v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am
©2014 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:48 pm
According to the EEOC’s lawsuit in EEOC v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United… [read post]
