Search for: "Marcotte v. Marcotte"
Results 101 - 120
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
About The Author A practicing attorney and Managing Shareholder of Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, P.C, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer’s more than 30 years’ of leading edge work as an practicing attorney, author, lecturer and industry and policy thought leader have resulted in her recognition as a “Top” attorney in employee benefits, labor and employment and health care law. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:50 pm
In Dobbs, the Supreme Court reversed its previous 1973 Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:29 am
., Pfeil v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense of… [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am
IDR Process Suspended The IDR process currently is suspended following the August 3 , 2023 ruling by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Crawford v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Employer and other sponsors of non-grandfathered group health plans, their insurers, administrators and fiduciaries should adjust the co-payment, deductible and out of pocket limits applicable for the 2015 plan year to reflect the recent adjustment in the out-of-pocket limits on essential benefits allowed by that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Meyers v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm
Oil and gas service giant Halliburton, has agreed to pay $18,293,557 to 1,016 employees nationwide to settle charges by the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am
About The Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER™ Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: Erisa & Employee Benefits,” “Health… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:28 pm
., Weidner v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Hilton, Marie-France Bich, Paul Vézina, Geneviève Marcotte et Jacques R. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
