Search for: "Marie v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 4,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2008, 11:00 am
The IPKat has received a fascinating circular from the Tri-State Hospitality Association which has the intriguing title "New York City to celebrate 75th anniversary of the Bloody Mary on Red Monday". [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:20 am by Tracy Thomas
UPS in Historical Context Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law, has posted Choice at Work: Young v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:10 pm by Daily Record Staff
Mary’s County denied his self-prepared “Motion For The St. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by The Federalist Society
On February 26, 2013,  the Supreme Court heard the oral argument in Maryland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by The Federalist Society
On February 26, 2013,  the Supreme Court heard the oral argument in Maryland v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a 38 page opinion in Marie v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: Michigan v SSM CA6 Opinion An excerpt: Because the State is not suing to enjoin a class III gaming activity, but instead a trust submission under MILCSA, § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) of IGRA does not abrogate the Tribe’s sovereign immunity, and the district court lacked jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:18 pm by Daily Record Staff
Mary’s County denied his self-prepared “Motion For The St. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:07 am by Daily Record Staff
Mary’s County to a total sentence of twenty years’ imprisonment. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Criminal Procedure Newly discovered evidence; ineffective assistance Mary Freeman appeals an order denying her Wis. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Sekmadienis v Lithuania ([2018] ECHR 112) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that a decision to fine a clothing company for the display of adverts referring to “Jesus” and “Mary” was a violation of Article 10. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Van Alstyne (William & Mary Law School) has posted A Critical Guide to Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:28 am
By Scott HerveyOn October 31, 2005, adult film actress Mary Cook filed a trademark registration application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark MARY CAREY for motion pictures featuring adult entertainment, and a series of... [read post]