Search for: "Marino v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
In Marino v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 7:56 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
Chiropractic surgeon John Marino bought a five percent state in Twin River Podiatry, P.A. and Twin Rivers Podiatric Surgery Center LLC (the opinion is not clear whether the interest was in one or both entities) comprised of 500 membership units for $500,000. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
No said the Appellate Division in the Marino case.Frank Marino sued his employer, the Hauppauge Union Free School District, alleging that the district had violated his rights under Section 3013 of the Education Law by reducing his annual salary by $4,148.* The district persuaded a State Supreme Court judge to dismiss Marino’s complaint, contending that Marino complaint should be resolved under the grievance procedure set out in the Taylor Law… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
United States, No. 13-632, and Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 5:38 am
" United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm
On September 8, 2011, the Second Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:12 pm
"The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has not yet determined whether the movant or the opposing party bears the burden of proving the waiver of the right to a jury trial, and other circuits are split on this issue. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
This Appellate Division decision reports that an attorney [Respondent] "pleaded guilty, in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York to misprision of a felony* in violation of 18 USC §4. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
This Appellate Division decision reports that an attorney [Respondent] "pleaded guilty, in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York to misprision of a felony* in violation of 18 USC §4. [read post]
