Search for: "Mark A. Anderson" Results 101 - 120 of 2,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2024, 7:28 am by Rick Hasen
Mark Graber for the Washington Monthly: In deciding for Trump, the Supreme Court acquired no additional political capital that might be employed against progressive rights and institutions. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:34 am by Astarita
, email Mark Astarita or call 212-509-6544 to speak to a securities lawyer. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:36 pm
The Kanyevel character is intimate with Pamela Anderson and recreates a stunt similar to one performed by Knievel in the 70s. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 4:40 am
There was a recent piece by Mark Anderson published by IEEE Spectrum, "The Gray Areas of Search-Engine Law" that raised a couple of interesting points:The law is always playing catch-up with technology. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
When tested, the bandana contained Christine Morton's blood and hair and the DNA of a man named Mark Norwood. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:57 am by Ashby Jones
“He will not testify,” said Anderson’s lawyer, Mark Geragos. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:04 pm by Steve Hall
His lawyer, Mark Dietz, said Anderson looks forward to the court of inquiry. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 4:33 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Continuing the discussion surrounding issues of personal risk and combat in relation to drone warfare (Anderson on Mazzetti, Corn, and Rona, we add this comment from Charles Dunlap, professor at Duke University Law School and a major general (ret.) in the Judge Advocate Corps in the US Air Force (I’ll post one or two more comments and then call this discussion closed. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:26 am by Kirk Anderson
Misdemeanors, while less severe than felonies, can still leave a lasting mark on your criminal record. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Michael Perry
By Frederick Mark Gedicks, Guy Anderson Chair and Professor of Law, Brigham Young University School of Law Abstract: The “contraception mandate” of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 poses a straightforward question for religious liberty jurisprudence: Must government excuse a believer from complying with a religiously burdensome law, when doing so would violate the liberty of others by imposing on them the costs and consequences of religious beliefs… [read post]