Search for: "Mark A. Padilla"
Results 1 - 20
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2008, 4:12 am
Judge Marcia Cooke sentenced Jose Padilla to just over 17 years today. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
") (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:05 pm
Ct. 2074, 2083 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:18 am
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:37 am
And in marked contrast to the Chaidez case, the parties seemed to concede that Padilla represented a “new rule”, which meant that advocates of retroactive application had the tough task of convincing the court that Padilla represented, in the words of the Hernandez court, “a development of fundamental significance” — a standard that, at least in the federal realm, no decision has been able satisfy save for, perhaps, the decision in… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
Wiggins, 539 U.S. at 521 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
The District Court’s Decision Padilla filed his suit in South Carolina District Court, where Judge Richard Mark Gergel denied his claims on both Bivens ”special factors” and qualified immunity grounds. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
The government moved to dismiss the case, and Judge Richard Mark Gergel granted the motion. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 6:15 am
But they were nonetheless significant, marking the first time Mr. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:07 am
Ct. 2074, 2083 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:56 pm
District Judge Richard Mark Gergel of Charleston conflicts directly with a ruling nearly two years ago by U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 6:54 pm
" Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball have this web exclusive online at Newsweek. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:31 pm
The question answered by the panel -- “whether it was not clearly established at that time that the treatment Padilla alleges he was subjected to amounted to torture” -- not only misses the mark, but is reminiscent of the very “categorical” and “formal” analysis that the Supreme Court rejected in Boumediene. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:29 am
Obviously, Padilla changed that. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:38 pm
Copyright © 2009 Mark Bennett. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:14 am
Ct. 2074, 2083 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
