Search for: "Mark Brown"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Schmidt Constitutional history often focuses on the development of judicial doctrine—say, tracing the career of the Fourteenth Amendment from Plessy and Lochner through Brown and Roe to SFFA and Dobbs. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
As Professor Mark W. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:33 am
The post New Mark Brown Book on Section 1983 Litigation appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:02 am
Brown and Christopher C. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 11:48 am
., Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., and Service Employees International Inc. had misrepresented water purification work and falsified time sheets in order to overbill the United States government during the Iraq war. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm
The book greatly influenced Thurgood Marshall, who “referred to the work as ‘the bible’ of Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
By contrast, as to Graber's Balkinization post, we think it much more likely to move Justice Jackson into the "Trump" camp and towards the "President is not an officer 'of' or 'under' the United States" position than anything we have written or are likely to write in the future.The post Professor Mark Graber Lectures Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson About White Supremacy appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
The senators “write to urge” DEA to “swiftly deschedule marijuana” and, while rescheduling to schedule III “would mark a significant step forward, it would not resolve the worst harms of the current system” for marijuana as a controlled substance, which “has had a devastating impact on our communities and is increasingly out of step with state law and public opinion. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:26 am
” And Mark Joseph Stern has an essay titled “Even Ketanji Brown Jackson Is Siding With Trump in the Supreme Court’s Ballot Case. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:36 pm
Another large linear scar marks the outside of his right elbow and forearm, according to a SBSD news release. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
Co-authoring the articles with me are Jalen Brown at Reed Smith, Kristin Davis at Thompson HD, Peter Georgiton at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, and Mark Hart at Hand Arendall Harrison Sale. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
In Brown Goldstein Levy LLP v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
[Justice Scalia erred because there are no “Officers of the United States” appointed outside Article II, Section II.] [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
AIM ImmunoTech, Inc. provides key guidance on advance notice bylaw provisions Posted by Andrew Freedman, Lori Marks-Esterman, and Adrienne Ward, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, on Thursday, February 1, 2024 Tags: AAU, Advance Notice Bylaw, ANB, Delaware law, Kellner, Shareholder activism How Do Consumers Use Firm Disclosure? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
AIM ImmunoTech, Inc. provides key guidance on advance notice bylaw provisions Posted by Andrew Freedman, Lori Marks-Esterman, and Adrienne Ward, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, on Thursday, February 1, 2024 Tags: AAU, Advance Notice Bylaw, ANB, Delaware law, Kellner, Shareholder activism How Do Consumers Use Firm Disclosure? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal Biden Super PAC Plans a Historic $250 Million Ad Blitz DNyuz – Reid Epstein and Shane Goldmacher (New York Times) | Published: 1/30/2024 The main Democratic super PAC supporting President Biden’s re-election bid, Future Forward, is beginning to reserve $250 million in advertising across the most important battleground states. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:46 pm
appeared first on Brown Rudnick. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
” Of course, that unprecedented bicameral congressional determination did not have any formal legal effect because “convict[ion]” under the Impeachment Clause of Article I, Section 3 requires “the Concurrence of two thirds of the [Senate] Members present,” and the Senate fell short of the necessary 67-vote mark. [read post]
