Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 161 - 180
of 17,986
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2010, 6:53 am
False marking deters scientific research and causes competitors and the public to make unnecessary investments into the validity and enforceability of patents that do not cover the products upon which they are marked. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
Thus, if you mark your widget as "patented" or covered by U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:47 am
Its EUTM Registration No. 10511591 for the 3D mark below, covering goods and services in Classes 12, 16, 35, 37, 39, and 41:2. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:00 pm
It's worth noting that the aforementioned marks do not cover entertainment goods or services. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
Patent number 8,225,376 covers technology that enables Facebook users to customize the way their profile appears to other users. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
The Global Legal Monitor from the Law Library of Congress covers legal news and developments worldwide. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
All funds raised will go to personally support Mark Denny, not the Innocence Project. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
False Marking US patent law also provides a penalty for falsely marking a product that is not covered by a patent. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
Moreover, a close link between the sign and the financial services covered by the CTM application was apparent, depriving the mark of any semantic depth, word-play or surprising or unexpected elements which could confer due distinctiveness. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:40 pm
This might include expanding the scope of your trade mark and marketplace monitoring to cover additional goods and services, or virtual uses. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:40 pm
This might include expanding the scope of your trade mark and marketplace monitoring to cover additional goods and services, or virtual uses. [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:05 am
” The complaint against Gillette and P&G similarly lists over thirty products being marked by those companies with expired patents or patents that do not cover the marked product. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
Moreover, the relevant economic harm didn’t have to occur in the US, because the Lanham Act covers “commerce within the control of Congress,” and prior Fourth Circuit precedent says that includes “foreign trade. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:15 am
Previously, before June 22, 2012, a trade mark was deemed to be protected in respect of the... [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:07 am
In particular, a relationship of functional complementarity was established between ‘games software’ in Class 9 covered by the applicant’s mark and ‘computers’ in the same class covered by the earlier mark.Furthermore, the fact that the English-speaking part of the public was informed of the existence of both of the marks at issue did not preclude the goods covered in Class 28 in the applicant’s mark and… [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:47 am
The Court concluded that trade mark law protects the average consumer's perception of "the relationship between the sign the mark embodies and a work covered by authors’ rights or related rights”.The French Court of Cassation also found Heben Music in breach of a contractual obligation of loyalty towards their partner, Mr X, for registering word mark “Bébé Lilly” without his consent or knowledge. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 4:18 am
The event was also the biggest one ever organized by EUIPO, with over 1,000 participants attending either in person or remotely from over 50 countries.I also had the honour to contribute to the programme with a presentation on fashion and IP.Among the issues that I covered in the 10 minutes at my disposal there was the registrability of less conventional fashion marks. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:32 am
On damages, the court awarded only $500 (with $250 going to the government) because Bon Tool could point to only one factory-order of marked products after Forest Group had "knowledge" that its stilts were not covered by the listed patent. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:38 pm
” The Federal Circuit also agreed that Solo Cup had “successfully rebutted the presumption” of “deceptive intent” by providing “credible evidence” that Solo Cup’s purpose in falsely marking “was not to deceive the public” with regard to either the expired patent markings or the “may be covered” language on its cup lids. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:42 am
It’s a slip and fall that occurs when the floor is wet and nobody marked it. [read post]
