Search for: "Mark D. Smith"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2017, 3:25 am
Bose, 91 USPQ2d at 1939 (quoting Smith Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
SMITH AND BRUCE M. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:32 pm
Mark Warner (D-Va.) is attempting to place heightened security standards on all Internet of Things (IoT) devices procured by any federal agency. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:47 am
In re Peter Wood, Geoffrey Dean-Smith, and Tasha Mudd, Serial No. 87022288 (October 25, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 8:16 am
Campaign Contributions and Expense Reports show that incumbents start their races with the cash on hand as follows: Nevada Supreme Court: Seat D - Mark Gibbons - $58,099 Clark County District Court Judges District Court Dept. 3 - Douglas Herndon - $160,167 (last report filed1/12/07) District Court Dept. 8 - Doug Smith (funds may be available from his justice court campaigns, amount unknown) District Court Dept. 10 - Jessie Walsh - $0 (end of 2002 report) District… [read post]
20 May 2015, 10:23 am
The Reed Smith Health Industry Washington Watch blog has been updated to report on recent health policy developments, including the following: Regulatory Developments. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:24 am
I'd vote for Goose. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 10:58 am
Smith, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences September 16, 2012 marks a momentous occasion for the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 2:51 pm
Recent LexBlog Q & A posts: Mark Obbie, professor at Syracuse University's S.I. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
" See Smith Int’l v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:13 am
Lionel Bently is the Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law at the University of Cambridge. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 3:45 am
"] October 26, 2021 - 1 PM: In re James Todd Smith, Serial No. 88595239 [Refusal to register THE INFLUENCE OF HIP HOP for "Radio communications; radio broadcasting information; mobile radio communication" because "the specimen of use does not show use of the mark in connection with the services identified in the application.] [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 5:54 am
Leahy (D-Vt.). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:08 am
The Trademark Examining Attorney refused registration of Applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 8:05 pm
For the past 18 hours, "Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
Al Franken (D-MN). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
At first instance,covered by the IPKat here, Peter Smith J (English judges usually only get a surname – unless there is another judge around with the same one, like, in this case, Sir Andrew Smith) dismissed almost all of Mattel’s claims: there was no infringement of Mattel's two SCRABBLE marks (and no passing off) by the use of SCRAMBLE or SCRAMBLE WITH FRIENDS. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 10:24 am
And you’d be wrong. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:04 am
In re Sherrilyn Kenyon, Serial No. 85396538 (July 9, 2014) [not precedential].The fact that the involved marks are identical weighed heavily against applicant in the Section 2(d) analysis. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:32 am
May 10, 2018) The court of appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction against one Skechers shoe for infringing the unregistered trade dress of the Adidas Stan Smith shoe, but reversed the grant of an injunction against another shoe that allegedly infringed and diluted the Adidas three-stripe mark. [read post]
