Search for: "Mark Herrmann"
Results 221 - 240
of 673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 8:58 am
From Mark Herrmann at Above the Law: "Are You A Crappy Litigator? [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 7:15 am
Mark Herrmann, who recently left Jones Day for Aon and also retired from his blog, Drug and Device blog, has left us with great insights into the blogging experience. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:02 am
My friend Mark Herrmann recently informed me about his Drug and Device Law blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:19 am
The Drug Recall Lawyer Blog has a post today supplementing/rebutting Mark Herrmann's blog post on the Drug and Device Law Blog on the Daubert issues in the Bausch & Lomb eye infection cases. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:54 am
Republished by Blog Post PromoterMy friend Mark Herrmann recently informed me about his Drug and Device Law blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:19 am
The Drug Recall Lawyer Blog has a post today supplementing/rebutting Mark Herrmann's blog post on the Drug and Device Law Blog on the Daubert issues in the Bausch & Lomb eye infection cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:03 pm
At Above the Law, in-house lawyer Mark Herrmann explains how in-house counsel actually choose outside counsel to hire: What does searching for new counsel mean? [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:49 pm
In the tradition of Judge Alex Kozinski’s The Wrong Stuff, here is an entertaining piece by the always entertaining Mark Herrmann. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 10:04 pm
Maryland gasoline leak results in award against ExxonMobil of "only" $150 million [Daily Record] Also in Maryland, Peter Angelos calls off a ten-year-old suit against lead paint manufacturers [Genova] Mark Herrmann (Jones Day, Drug & Device Law Blog) op-ed... [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:18 am
Mark Herrmann, the Chief Counsel – Litigation and Global Chief Compliance Officer at Aon and author of the Inside Straight column at AboveTheLaw, shares his thoughts on what drives partners and in-house counsel nuts. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 3:07 am
Biglaw partner turned senior in-house lawyer Mark Herrmann gives some thoughts on bad in-house jobs over at ATL: “I recently had lunch with a 40-ish person who was a veteran of several in-house jobs. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 7:50 pm
Are you reading Mark Herrmann and Jim Beck's Drug and Device Law Blog? [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
Dave Alden, Mark's former colleague at Jones Day, just sent us a copy of an article the he, Herrmann, and Brad Harrison wrote entitled "The Meaning Of The Parallel Requirements Exception Under Lohr And Riegel," 65 N.Y.U. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:57 pm
Over at Above the Law, Mark Herrmann reminds us that Word can give you statistics about the readability of your writing every time you run the spell-and-grammar checker. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
In a recent amicus brief, Mark Herrmann, on behalf of Black Cops Against Police Brutality, looks at the case from a different angle. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
Our esteemed blogger emeritus, Mark Herrmann, has some things to say about blogging as a business tool, over at his in-house counsel blog on Above The Law. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
Area-man Mark Herrmann didn’t choose to be a hero. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:00 am
Check out these 10 marketing tips from Mark Herrmann, the Vice President and Chief Counsel – Litigation at Aon, which sells risk management services, insurance and reinsurance, and management consulting. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
Courtesy of Mark Herrmann on his Drug and Device Law blog, here is an excellent summary and commentary on the new Federal Rule of Evidence 502 that was signed into law by the President a few days ago, and even has application in some manner to state court cases. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:53 am
Here are two legal-writing posts that caught my eye today: "Inside Straight: Writing For The Trash Or Writing To Be Read," by Mark Herrmann-- A very few lawyers write briefs that stand up and sing on the reader’s desk: The introductory paragraph draws the reader in; the statement of facts tells an interesting story; the argument engagingly (but compellingly) explains an issue, perhaps with a (very light) sense of humor. [read post]
