Search for: "Mark J. Bradley" Results 161 - 180 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am by Norman L. Eisen
Jury selection started earlier this week in the first ever criminal trial of a U.S. president. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
Maintained by two editors – Wendy Johnson Lario and Kristine J. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Billion Dollar Fix for Free - http://bit.ly/zD4RXW (Craig Ball) A Practical Guide To Responding To Government Investigations - bit.ly/zS0diw (Roderick Thomas, Mark Sweet) A Good eDiscovery Team: eDiscovery Lawyers – Part II - bit.ly/AwOmmY (Dennis Kiker) All’s “Well” for Halliburton: No Sanctions Result from BP’s Spoliation Claims | Cozen O’Connor… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Over 250 concerned professionals signed up to a letter which has been sent to the relevant judiciary including Sir Nicholas Wall, Ryder J, and Senior DJ at the Registry, Philip Waller (I suspect it is not the judges but managers and accountants that need persuading that this is an ill advised plan). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
”[5] Faigman’s invocation of “ordinary practice” of epidemiology was seriously wide of the mark. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:55 pm
Maintained by two editors – Wendy Johnson Lario and Kristine J. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Bradley of Duke University, and Michael Newton of Vanderbilt University; Research Forum Committee members Máximo Langer, UCLA, and David Zaring, University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business; and Paul Stephan, University of Virginia, and Robert Sloane, Boston University. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
  See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
” Of course, that unprecedented bicameral congressional determination did not have any formal legal effect because “convict[ion]” under the Impeachment Clause of Article I, Section 3 requires “the Concurrence of two thirds of the [Senate] Members present,” and the Senate fell short of the necessary 67-vote mark. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]