Search for: "Mark J. Neuberger"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2014, 12:33 pm
Kopp Detroit, Michigan 313.234.7140jkopp@foley.com Mark J. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
In light of the wording used by Lord Neuberger, PCCM was effectively trying to obtain a similar monopoly without registration, relying on its repute among UK residents. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
Perhaps, in that period, Hildyard J should have read one of Mark Wonnacott’s rather good, but decidedly specialist, landlord and tenant historical monographs. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
The first Improver question was marked as "generally satisfactory". [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
– Spartanburg attorney J. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:46 pm
– Orange County lawyer Paul J. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
Floyd J dismissed the claimants' action. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
[To make out an offence under s.92 Trade Marks Act 1994, the use of the trademark in question must be as an indication of trade origin. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:52 am
Section 56(2) entitles owners of marks who are domiciled or have a business in a Convention country, but whose marks are well known in the UK, to restrain by injunction the use in the UK of a trade mark which is identical or similar to that mark in relation to identical or similar goods or services where the use is likely to cause confusion. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:53 am
The judgment of the court in Fiddes v Channel Four ([2010] EWCA Civ 730) was given by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:31 am
Lord Neuberger also suggested that developing the law on duties and responsibilities of anonymous speech might be preferable to the chilling effect created by the fear of exposure. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
The first Improver question was marked as "generally satisfactory". [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
(c) In how many libel appeals did Eady J, Tugendhat J or Sharp J appear on the panel? [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
The Australian newspaper has an interesting piece on the tweeting situation in Australian courts, quoting Professor Mark Pearson (@journlaw on Twitter), who says: “Both the courts and the media need to exchange in a discussion about this topic. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
On the same day there was the publication of the much anticipated report of the Neuberger Committee on Superinjunctions. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
From the Blogs The Panopticon Blog has a post by Robin Hopkins entitled “Some Reflections on Super Injunctions and Parallel Universes“ – dealing with the Report of the Neuberger Committee. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:28 am
Moderator: Professor Christopher J. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
In respect of duty of care the Court of Appeal also reversed the decision of Jack J. and found that the church clearly owed a duty of care to boys who might be invited by a priest to the Presbytery, this was not tantamount to owing a duty to the whole world as the Judge had found. [read post]
28 May 2016, 4:50 pm
Comment The j udge accepted the University’s argument that there was “no large principle at stake here. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
This letter asserted that Chobani had breached EU regulations, that it had failed to mark its products with a requisite identification of their place of manufacture, and that it had failed to make it clear that it could not confirm that its yoghurt was free from artificially introduced bovine growth hormone. [read post]
