Search for: "Mark L"
Results 41 - 60
of 12,992
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 3:34 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:23 am
"As to the marks, Opposer's L'OREAL PARIS mark is obviously identical to Applicant's mark. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Robert L. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:36 am
Finally, the Board noted that there is no evidence of third-party use of NAUTICA, and there is evidence that opposer policed its mark.In finding confusion likely and sustaining the opposition, the Board repeated the CAFC's observation that "there is no excuse for even approaching the well-known mark of a competitor inasmuch as 'a strong mark ... casts a long shadow which competitors must avoid.'"Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:54 am
Attorney Mark L. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
Not so for product shape.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:37 pm
Yesterday marked the 100th anniversary of the death of Samuel L. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:10 am
Such a generalized association in the purchaser's mind between the product mark and the restaurant services does not suffice as the requisite “direct association” between the mark and the services which would make the asserted mark a service mark for the restaurant services themselves.And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
I think the latter.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:18 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:42 pm
Der Bundesgerichtshof hat die vom Bundespatentgericht ausgesprochene Löschung der Marke bestätigt. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:28 pm
Crimes: The Noncitizen Presumption of Dangerousness by Mark L. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:10 am
In addition, in the present case, while the graphic representation of the 3D trade marks filed by the applicant contains the distinctive wording “Loro Piana” or the letters “L” and “P”, these verbal elements lack in the application for the position trade mark. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:31 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 3:46 am
L. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
"And so, the Board affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.TTABlog comment: I guess you can say the Applicant here was left in Dire Straits.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:27 am
., July 2, 2009, order) (L. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
The Board ruled that the 1982 agreement prohibits use of the subject mark, and it entered judgment summarily in favor of B&L. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 1:11 pm
John L. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 8:05 am
Brian L. [read post]
