Search for: "Mark L"
Results 81 - 100
of 12,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2014, 4:58 am
Civil Detention Paradigm by Mark L. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:25 am
"The Board further found that DON and L'IL do not dominate the cited marks. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 2:43 am
We find that the specimen shows use of applicant's mark to identify the services specified in the application.And so the Board reversed the refusal.TTABlog comment: An ugly decision, and an uglier football field.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:58 am
Except for the issue of the marking of cigarettes,here,this Kat is hard-pressed to recall the last time that trade marks were the focus of passionate (or other) public debate. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:40 am
Oh là là! [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:01 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 1:59 am
The signs are visually and phonetically highly similar on account of the coincidence in the letters ‘L*ra Cr*ft’ and the letters ‘o’ and ‘a’ being merely exchanged. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 3:45 am
On balance, we find that the in-part identity of the services and the similarity of the marks’ commercial impressions outweigh any weaknesses in Opposer’s mark, and that confusion is likely between Opposer’s mark and Applicant’s mark .Conclusion: The Board sustained the opposition to applicant's mark.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 3:37 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:42 am
" A Man Called Ove would never drive a Volvo.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 3:15 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
Dabei teilte Sie die von uns im Rahmen des Artikels vertretene Einschätzung, dass diese Entscheidung wohl den Schluss auf eine Löschung der Marke “POST” im Oktober nahelege. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
” The district court found this admission highly significant, stating that “[l]abeling a product with ‘patent pending’ makes it readily apparent that the character of the product does not make it so that a proper mark ‘can not’ be affixed to the product. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 10:40 am
L. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 3:21 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
UK courts would also be in a better position to move away from unpopular CJEU decisions: the panel pointed to L’Oreal v Bellure (C-487/07) as a good example of this (in which many, including Sir Robin Jacob, criticised the CJEU for finding that “smell-alike” perfumes can infringe trade marks, even in a situation where the seller tells the buyer that the perfume is a smell-alike) (see hereand here) [But what will be the relevance of CJEU judgments issued before… [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:12 pm
” SRI Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:01 pm
City L. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:03 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 1:00 am
L. [read post]
