Search for: "Mark Roberts" Results 61 - 80 of 9,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 7:33 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Feder and Lee, Katherine and Grimmelmann, James and Grimmelmann, James and Daphne Ippolito, Daphne Ippolito and Callison-Burch, Christopher and Choquette-Choo, Christopher A. and Mireshghallah, Niloofar and Brundage, Miles and Mimno, David and Choksi, Madiha Zahrah and Balkin, Jack M. and Carlini, Nicholas and De Sa, Christopher and Frankle, Jonathan and Ganguli, Deep and Gipson, Bryant and Guadamuz, Andres and Harris, Swee Leng and Jacobs, Abigail and Joh, Elizabeth E. and Kamath, Gautam and… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
The fact that Sir Mark had been buried at Sledmere in a sealed lead coffin raised the likelihood of better samples being found for the petitioner’s research. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
 Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Seek to Curb Utility Spending on Politics, Ads and More Extras Arkansas Advocate – Robert Zullo | Published: 2/27/2024 After a string of scandals and amid rising bills, lawmakers in statehouses across the country have been pushing legislation to curb utilities spending ratepayer money on lobbying, expert testimony in rate cases, goodwill advertising, charitable giving, trade association memberships, and other costs. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:14 am by David Oscar Markus
  The Herald covers it here:A South Florida businessman pleaded guilty on Thursday to stealing millions of dollars from the taxpayer-funded Medicare program, capping a long-running healthcare fraud case marked by a commutation of his initial 20-year sentence by President Donald Trump in late 2020. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Gene Takagi
” Washington Post Equity and Justice Related Articles & Resources: Smithsonian Latino museum sued over internship’s ‘pro-Latino discrimination’ (Julian Mark, Washington Post) As DEI gets more divisive, companies are ditching their teams (Taylor Telford, Washington Post) Location, location, location: The impact of place on racial equity (JP Julien, Robert Fusaro, Lucia Rahilly, McKinsey Institute for Black Economic Mobility) Climate Change… [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Robert Burrell IP Australia exerts extraordinary control over legislative agenda; if you can persuade IP Au. that something needs to change, then it can change quite quickly. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Use expressio unis to get at the fact that the noncommercial use holding is limited to situations where the challenged use is “used as a mark for a commercial product”; the term noncommercial use can reasonably include uses as a mark for political speech—Robert Kennedy, Jr., is using his father’s famous name to promote himself politically (also highlighting the importance of small differences when it comes to speech in the political realm). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:34 am by Rob Robinson
“Cellebrite capped an outstanding 2023 performance with excellent fourth-quarter results marked by strong top-line growth, notable improvement in our profitability and solid cash flow from operations. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Robert Zeidman, a computer forensics expert did just that, a federal judge determined, upholding a previous ruling from a private arbitration panel. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Thomas P. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But what Post does say strikes me as right on the mark, and it’s a good foil for my views on the labor chapters. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  A symposium on Robert Post's Holmes Devise history of the Taft Court is at Balkinization. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In Two Pesos, the Supreme Court tells us that “the general principles qualifying a mark for registration under § 2 of the Lanham Act are for the most part applicable in determining whether an unregistered mark is entitled to protection under § 43(a). [read post]