Search for: "Mark S Rogers"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
This Sunday marks Michael Vick's official return to the National Football League--an event that has been widely criticized by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals ("PETA"), as well as some sports writers and doggie bloggers. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:30 am
For example, Rogers’s representation of drug companies at the turn of the century familiarized him with the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:00 pm
According to Chief Judge Rogers, Procedures that would facilitate speed and efficiency of these proceedings could include: requiring the challenger to submit evidence sufficient to support its grounds at the time of filing the petition, and the registrant to submit proof of use of the mark with its answer; limiting discovery to the challenger’s standing if it would prove dispositive; and an abbreviated schedule with no oral hearing. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:35 am
by Roger Alford Today is an historic day in world population statistics, marking the day that planet reaches seven billion inhabitants. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:25 pm
Featuring Mark Cuban (HDNet), Blake Krikorian (CEO, Sling Media), Chad Hurley (YouTube), Gina Lombardi (President, MediaFLO; Qualcomm), Ben Pyne (Disney and ESPN networks), Tom Rogers (TiVo), and Phil Rosenthal (Writers Guild of America, West and Screen Actors Guild). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:25 am
Mark Udall’s 2015 Marks Lecture, which he will deliver at the James E. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:00 am
To mark the 150th Anniversary of the Dred Scott v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:38 am
Rosen, The SPEECH Act’s Unfortunate Parochialism: Of Libel Tourism and Legitimate Pluralism Roger P. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA ___________________________________ REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT __________________________________ MARK S. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
Rather, the Court relied on case-law showing that where the use of a mark is “at least in part” for the purposes of source identification, Rogers has no proper role, even if the defendant is also “making an expressive comment” by way of its use. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:57 am
"From Roger Cohen (in the NYT). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
In dismissing plaintiff's false marking action, the court agreed with Unique Prod. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:10 pm
Today, the current saga involving Alex Rodriguez,, Miguel Tejada, Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, and Mark McGwire should be a lesson to those that are considering talking to the Government without consulting with an attorney beforehand. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:00 am
Rogers Test - ThresholdThe greeting cards derive from Chris Gordon's viralvideo, The Crazy Nastyass Honey BadgerOutlined in Rogers v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Like all of our newsletters, it's free. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Like all of our newsletters, it's free. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:08 am
Friday’s decision marked the end of this six-year legal battle. [read post]
