Search for: "Mark v. Hutchinson"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Coupled with plaintiff's testimony that all the other doors in the building had doorstops, an issue of fact exists as to whether defendants should have noticed the "visible and apparent" condition that the subject door was missing a doorstop, posing a foreseeable risk that the door could slam a person's hand into the wall (Hutchinson v Sheridan Hill House Corp., 26 NY3d 66, 83 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Coupled with plaintiff's testimony that all the other doors in the building had doorstops, an issue of fact exists as to whether defendants should have noticed the "visible and apparent" condition that the subject door was missing a doorstop, posing a foreseeable risk that the door could slam a person's hand into the wall (Hutchinson v Sheridan Hill House Corp., 26 NY3d 66, 83 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND… [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
True, Jackson opposed the bank on policy grounds, but he also denied that the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
But in a series of decisions, culminating in Kelly v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
“Mark, you should call Jeff. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Most strikingly, surprise testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, revealed a level of personal involvement by Trump in the events leading up to the Capitol riot that was sufficient to change the mind of my notoriously cantankerous Lawfare colleague Alan Rozenshtein as to whether Trump’s speech on the Ellipse that day constituted criminal incitement. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 6:05 am
Litigation in the case, Thompson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am
On January 2, when Cassidy Hutchinson, an aide to Mark Meadows, asked Meadows about the plans for January 6, he replied: “There’s a lot going on, Cass, but I don’t know. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
In an ironic twist, the Times v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
Adam Chan described the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am
On the basis of former Mark Meadows’ aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony on June 28, and other publicly available information, key White House aides who knew something was amiss and Cabinet officials who considered invoking the 25th amendment to remove then-President Donald Trump for incapacity did nothing to publicly alert Americans to the danger their democracy faced. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:40 am
But Tuesday’s explosive testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, changed our minds. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
