Search for: "Markell v Markell"
Results 1 - 20
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2008, 10:42 am
Related Posts: Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 10:59 am
This question is especially timely in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Philip Morris v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 5:40 pm
Professor Dan Markel has posted an abstract of his Retributive Damages article on PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
7 May 2007, 4:23 pm
Lorraine v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:08 am
Dan Markel has posted Retributive Damages to SSRN. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
Indeed, ever since the Supreme Court decided Booker v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:38 pm
The focus on and anxiety about (purposeful) shaming takes particular effect in a now well-known case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm
Dan Markel (Florida State University College of Law) has posted May Minors Be Retributively Punished after Panetti (and Graham)? [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:10 pm
Tupy) an en banc rehearing of the court’s initial decision in the case of Markel Interests, LLC, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 8:44 am
Markel International Insurance Co Ltd v Surety Guarantee Consultants Ltd & others; (1) QBE Insurance (Europe) Ltd (2) Amalfi Underwriting Ltd v Surety Guarantee Consultants Ltd & others [2008] EWHC 1135 (Comm) concerned a joint trial of two separate but similar cases brought by each of Markel and QBE, together with Amalfi, in which they alleged that the Defendants had defrauded them in connection with the writing of surety bonds between January… [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
Here is the abstract:In Panetti v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:05 am
In Markel v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:11 am
In Markel International Insurance Company v Timothy Higgins, QBE Insurance (Europe) and another v Timothy Higgins [2009] EWCA Civ 790, the Court of Appeal held that the High Court Judge was correct in his finding that the defendant, Mr Higgins, an underwriting agent who suffered from Alzheimer's disease, had either conspired with others to defraud Markel and QBE (his principals) or that he had given dishonest assistance to others in breach of his fiduciary… [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:44 am
Horton-Texas, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
Day, Katherine V. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:11 am
In Markel Capital Limited v (1) Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG (2) Continentale Sachversicherung AG and Bloemers & Partners Limited [2008] EWHC 2517 (Comm), the Court was asked to consider a summary judgment application by Markel in respect of its claim for a declaration of non-liability on the ground that a condition precedent to its liability had not been satisfied. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:06 am
Those of you who use the Epstein-Markell-Ponoroff contract law casebook teach the case of Reed v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:46 am
., v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:59 am
"13 In addition, under State Farm v. [read post]
